Origin 1100 to 1200
The chain of spiritual transmission: the named sequence of masters through which a Sufi order traces its teaching back to its founder and, through him, ordinarily to Ali or Abu Bakr and so to the Prophet. Each initiate receives the chain at initiation, and reciting it is part of the litany in many orders.
Its function is authorisation. Because the teaching is held to be transmitted personally rather than learned from books, the chain is what distinguishes a master authorised to initiate others from someone teaching on his own account, and a claim to guide without a chain is not accepted within the orders. The same logic runs through the wider tradition: the chain of transmitters authenticating a hadith, the chain in a certificate to teach a text, and the chain of reciters authorising a Quranic reading all work this way, and the silsila is the devotional case of a pattern that structures Islamic knowledge generally.
Chains are also contested. Historians have shown that several are extended backwards to fill gaps between figures who could not have met, and the orders themselves acknowledge a category of transmission received from a deceased master in vision, which cannot be documented and which critics treat as evidence that the genre is constructed. That criticism does not settle the question of what the chains meant to those who transmitted them.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period FoundedSufism, from the 12th century 1 Organisation
Category of Structure Status
Status TodayLiving tradition, practised today 1 Learn More
The Chain That Guarantees the Teaching
The silsila is the named chain of transmission of a Sufi order, and it functions as the guarantee that the method a disciple receives is authentic rather than invented.
An unbroken line
A silsila is the sequence of masters through which an order traces its teaching back from the living guide, master to master, to the founder and, through him, ordinarily to Ali or to Abu Bakr and so to the Prophet. The chain is not decorative genealogy: it is the warrant of authenticity, since the authority to initiate and to transmit the litany is held to pass down the line, and a guide without a valid silsila has nothing to confer. Reciting the chain is itself a devotional act in many orders.
Where the chains divide
The point at which a silsila runs back through Ali, as most do, or through Abu Bakr, as the Naqshbandi line does, is doctrinally significant and marks the orders off from one another. Because the whole authority of an order rests on the continuity of its chain, disputes over succession are disputes over the silsila, and the splitting of orders into sub-branches is recorded as the branching of the chain. The institution thus makes lineage the load-bearing element of Sufi authority, in the same way that ordination lineage is load-bearing in monastic Buddhism.
A Chain of Authorization Borrowed from Hadith Scholarship
The silsila's logic is borrowed directly from a much older Islamic discipline: the isnad, the chain of named transmitters that authenticates a report of the Prophet's words or actions, in which a hadith is only as trustworthy as the unbroken, named sequence of people who passed it down. Sufi orders adapted the same verification method to a different kind of transmission, using a named chain of masters, each authorized by the one before, to certify that a teaching or initiation genuinely descends from the order's founder and, through him, back toward the Prophet himself.
Most orders trace this chain through Ali, treating him as the channel through which the Prophet's esoteric teaching passed into the Sufi tradition, which is why so many silsilas converge on the same name a few links back from their own founder. The Naqshbandi order is the well known exception, tracing its chain instead through Abu Bakr, a distinction Naqshbandi writers have long treated as significant, since it ties their order's legitimacy to the same figure Sunni tradition already recognized as the Prophet's first political successor rather than to the line more associated with Shia claims. Written silsila charts, sometimes illuminated and hung in a lodge, served the same evidentiary function a certificate of ordination does elsewhere, and an initiate could be asked to recite the chain from memory as proof of standing within the order.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Element Of
The chain of transmission is what authorises a master to initiate, and a claim to guide without one is not accepted within the tradition.
Rejected Here
Salafism, Denominations The chain of masters is refused along with the order it authorises, since Salafi teaching admits no transmission of religious authority outside scholarship in scripture and hadith.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.