Vices
Wrath (Ira)
Satan (Amon)
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 375 to 425 CE
Wrath, in Latin ira, is uncontrolled or inordinate anger, the desire for vengeance carried beyond the bounds of justice. It is one of the seven capital sins, and its contrary virtue is Patience. In Peter Binsfeld's scheme of demons it is assigned to Satan, and by some to Amon, and in the esoteric scheme used here to Mars, the planet of aggression and war, though the planetary attributions of the sins vary by author. It is presented here academically, as a shadow entry.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period375 to 425 CE 1Tradition: Christian monasticism: the eight tempting thoughts of Evagrius and Cassian Origin Period590 2Tradition: Gregory the Great's seven capital vices Place of OriginThe monastic settlements of Nitria, Kellia and Scetis in the Egyptian desert, where the eight tempting thoughts were set out; the sevenfold Latin form is Gregory the Great's, at Rome 3 Origin of the NameLatin ira, rendering the Greek orge 3 Origin of the NameThe demon this vice carries as its subtitle, Satan, comes from the classification of demons published by Peter Binsfeld, suffragan bishop of Trier, in 1589 in a treatise arguing that confessions extracted under torture should be believed. The pairing belongs to the witch trials, not to the theological tradition 4 Attributed Author / CompilerEvagrius Ponticus (c. 345-399), who set out the eight tempting thoughts, and John Cassian, who carried them west; Gregory the Great (c. 540-604), whose Moralia in Job produced the sevenfold scheme 3 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceGreek orge. Cassian treats it as the thought most destructive of monastic community because it makes prayer impossible; his remedy is the removal of the occasions of anger and the refusal to let it stand overnight, not the suppression of the passion 6Tradition: Christian monasticism: the eight tempting thoughts of Evagrius and Cassian Meaning in the Attesting SourceInordinate anger, the desire for vengeance carried past what justice allows. Aquinas holds that anger at wrongdoing can be rightly ordered and that a failure to be angry at what deserves it is itself a defect: the vice is the excess, the misdirection or the duration 7Tradition: Aquinas, Summa Theologiae Status
Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 5Tradition: Roman Catholicism Sourced to the subject's own accountOne of the seven capital sins as the Catechism enumerates them. The list in this form, with pride among the seven and acedia in place of tristitia, is the Catechism's; neither Gregory nor Aquinas gives it in exactly this shape Doctrinal Status DetailSourced to the subject's own accountDistinguished in the tradition from righteous anger; the sin lies specifically in vengeance exceeding the bounds of justice, not in anger as such. 5 Disputed
Origin PeriodRooted in Evagrius Ponticus's eight tempting thoughts, set out from the Egyptian desert monastic settlements of Nitria, Kellia and Scetis around the late fourth century CE, and carried west by John Cassian. Gregory the Great reduced the eight to the familiar seven, wrath among them, in his Moralia in Job around 590 CE. 3 Learn More
Wrath
Wrath, ira, is inordinate anger, the desire for vengeance carried past what justice allows. The tradition is careful not to condemn anger as such: Aquinas holds that anger at wrongdoing is a passion of the irascible appetite that can be rightly ordered, and that a failure to be angry at what deserves it is itself a defect, so the vice lies in the excess, the misdirection or the duration. The scriptural texts read here are Ephesians 4:26, be angry and sin not, and the accounts of the cleansing of the temple, which the tradition cites as an instance of righteous anger. Cassian treats ira at length as the vice most destructive of monastic community, since it makes prayer impossible; his remedy is not suppression but the removal of the occasions of anger and the refusal to let it stand overnight.
The Apophthegmata Patrum, the collected sayings of the Desert Fathers compiled from oral tradition in the fourth and fifth centuries, preserves a much-repeated account of Abba Ammonas, who reported that he had struggled against his own anger for fourteen years before mastering it, an anecdote later spiritual writers cited as evidence that overcoming wrath is a slow discipline of habituation rather than a single decisive victory, consistent with Cassian's own insistence that the vice is uprooted gradually, through the patient removal of its occasions, rather than suppressed by a single act of will.
The Long Shadow of Wrath
Wrath is the vice most directly connected to the harms the moral tradition was designed to restrain, and it has the widest cross-traditional treatment. Buddhist analysis places dvesha, aversion or hatred, among the three root poisons alongside greed and delusion, and the Dhammapada opens with a sustained treatment of the futility of hatred repaid with hatred. Stoic philosophy produced in Seneca's De Ira one of the most searching ancient treatments of the passion, arguing that anger is never useful and always a form of temporary madness, a stronger position than the Christian one. The virtue set against wrath in the popular scheme is patience, which the tradition understands as the capacity to bear provocation and suffering without being deformed by them, not as passivity. The demon assigned to it in the 1589 scheme is Satan or Amon.
The philosophical dispute behind the Christian position runs deeper than the tradition's own texts state directly: Seneca's Stoic treatise De Ira argues, across three books addressed to his brother Novatus, that anger is never rational and never useful even when provoked by real wrongdoing, while Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics takes the opposing view, that a complete absence of anger at what deserves it (aorgesia) is itself a deficiency of character rather than a virtue. Aquinas's classification of wrath as a vice only in its excess, rather than a passion to be eliminated altogether, sides explicitly with the Aristotelian position against the stricter Stoic ideal some earlier Christian ascetic writers had found more congenial.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Contrasts With
Hatred, the second unwholesome root, is the nearest counterpart to wrath among the capital sins, and it is a root rather than an entry on a schedule. The third root, delusion, has no counterpart among the seven at all.
A capital sin, not a mortal one. Wrath names a root from which further sins grow, and most particular instances of it fail at least one of the three conditions that would make an act mortal.
Wrath renders orge, one of the eight thoughts, treated in this literature as a disorder of the irascible part of the soul to be healed rather than as an offence to be punished.
Element Of
Anger is among the eight thoughts of the Eastern ascetic tradition.
Wrath is among the capital sins Rome enumerates, a desire for revenge that goes beyond the correction of a fault.
Opposed By
The atlas holds no dedicated entry for achzariut, cruelty or hard-heartedness, chesed's classical rabbinic contrary; Wrath, already catalogued among the seven deadly sins, is the nearest existing entry, a cross-tradition approximation rather than an equivalence.
Gevurah's own proof text, Proverbs 16:32 as quoted in Pirkei Avot 4:1, names being slow to anger as the mark of true might; Wrath, already catalogued among the seven deadly sins, is the atlas's existing entry for that disposition, textually the closest fit rather than an approximation.
Patience is the classical contrary virtue paired against Wrath, one of the seven remedial virtues the medieval tradition, following Prudentius's Psychomachia, set one against one with the seven capital sins.
Originates in Language
Sources
1. The Praktikos and Chapters on Prayer
Evagrius Ponticus; John Eudes Bamberger (trans.), Cistercian Publications, 1972Praktikos, ch. 6, the eight generic thoughtsView the Source 2. Moralia in Job
Gregory the GreatBook XXXI
3. The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept, with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature
Morton W. Bloomfield, Michigan State College Press, 1952ch. 2, from Evagrius and Cassian to GregoryView the Source 4. Tractatus de confessionibus maleficorum et sagarum
Peter Binsfeld, Trier, 1589the classification of demons by the capital vicesView the Source 5. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd edition
Holy See, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997paragraph 1866, the seven capital sinsthe holders' own accountView the Source 6. The Institutes (De Institutis Coenobiorum)
John CassianBook VIII, on the spirit of anger
7. Summa Theologiae
The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 1611Ephesians 4:26View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.