Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Les Mysteres de la Main

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Adolphe Desbarrolles's nineteenth-century text is the tradition's own primary statement of a palmistry system, not independent scholarship, and this record describes it as such rather than as an outside verified account: it sets out one nineteenth-century French practitioner's own scheme of hand mounts, lines and fingers, a system later popular palmistry still references but that carries no outside verification that hand shape or lines actually predict character or fate. Its value here is narrowly as the documented origin of this specific historical system, checkable against the text itself, not as evidence the system is ancient, universally standard, or empirically supported. Use it for the content of Desbarrolles's own palmistry system as he presented it; it is not evidence that palmistry accurately reads character, a claim this primary source does not itself attempt to establish independently.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
One practitioner's own invented esoteric system with no outside verification, cited as the tradition's own account rather than as independent evidence, in line with how this register holds works of the same kind.
Notes
Adolphe Desbarrolles's nineteenth-century French primary text on palmistry (chiromancy), setting out the system of hand mounts, lines and fingers still referenced in modern popular palmistry. Use for the content of this specific historical palmistry system as it presents it; a primary esoteric text from one influential nineteenth-century practitioner, not a scholarly history of palmistry as a practice or evidence that its system is ancient or universally standard.
Citation
Author
Adolphe Desbarrolles
Publisher
E. Dentu
Publication Year
1859
URL
https://archive.org/details/b28097750
Source Type
primary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (117 claims)

This source backs 117 claims across the atlas. As facts: 79 well-attested, 8 partially Attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 28 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Palm Lines, 35 claims: 27 well-attested, 8 general references.
  • Palm Mounts, 27 claims: 18 well-attested, 9 general references.
  • Articles, 20 claims: 12 well-attested, 8 partially Attested.
  • Fingers, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 5 general references.
  • Categories, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sections, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Holds

2

Disciplines

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.