Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Shirk

Also Known As Association · idolatry · polytheismOriginal Term shirk (Arabic, associating)
God and Divine Nature

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 610 to 632 CE

Shirk is the counterpart of tawhid: to attribute to another the uniqueness that belongs to God alone, in lordship, in worship, or in the divine attributes. It is the gravest sin in Islam.

The classification into greater and lesser shirk matters. Greater shirk is worship directed to another and takes a person outside the faith. Lesser shirk covers such things as performing religious acts for the sake of being seen, which is a fault rather than an apostasy. Beyond that lies hidden shirk, the subtle attribution of efficacy to means rather than to God, which the devotional literature treats as a permanent hazard for the pious rather than a crime.

The reason this entry matters is not the definition but the use. From the eighteenth century onward, reform movements in the Arabian peninsula and elsewhere applied the charge of shirk to practices that the great majority of Muslims had long regarded as legitimate: visiting graves and the tombs of saints, asking the Prophet or a righteous person to intercede, the devotional culture surrounding Sufi shrines. On that basis shrines have been demolished, including in the Hijaz in the 1920s and, more recently, by armed movements in Mali, Libya, Iraq and Syria.

The dispute is genuinely internal and it is not marginal. The majority position across classical Sunni scholarship permitted seeking intercession and distinguished it sharply from worship, on the ground that asking a person to pray for one is not directing worship to that person. Those pressing the charge of shirk deny the distinction holds in practice. Presenting either side as the Islamic view would misdescribe a live argument between large bodies of Muslims.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Defined and binding within this tradition 1Tradition: Islam
The one sin the Quran declares unforgiven if a person dies in it
Doctrinal Category
God and Divine Nature 1
The Claim
The Claim
Shirk, generally translated as associating partners with God, is regarded in Islamic theology as the gravest possible sin, a violation of the strict monotheism, tawhid, at the centre of Islamic belief. 2
Origins
Origin Period
610 to 632 CE 1
Held By
Islam 1
Learn More
Association: The Line That Tawhid Draws

Shirk is the association of partners, rivals or equals with God, and it is the exact negation of tawhid. The Qur'an treats it as the one thing not forgiven in those who die unrepentant of it: "God does not forgive that partners be associated with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills" (4:48, repeated at 4:116). Classical theology divides it into major shirk, directing worship, ultimate trust or ultimate fear to another, and minor or hidden shirk, of which the standard example is riya, performing acts of worship to be seen doing them.

The Qur'an's primary referent is the deities of pre-Islamic Mecca, the "partners" whose intercession its opponents claimed (39:3). It extends the charge to taking rabbis and monks as lords beside God (9:31), and it addresses Christian formulations in terms its own readers took as a warning against compromising divine unity (4:171, 5:73). Christian theologians dispute that reading, holding trinitarian doctrine to be monotheistic; the disagreement is old and is one of the fixed points of Muslim-Christian theological exchange.

Within Islam the argument is over reach. Ibn Taymiyya, and later Wahhabi and Salafi scholarship, extended shirk to intercession sought at tombs, vows made to saints and oaths sworn by other than God. Sufis, most traditionalist Sunnis and Shia reject the extension, holding that asking a righteous person to pray for one no more makes that person a god than asking a living friend to do so. Mainstream jurists of every school have hedged takfir, pronouncing another Muslim an unbeliever, with heavy restrictions, precisely because the charge of shirk is so grave.

Shirk as a Reform Movement's Target

Beyond the theological definition, shirk has functioned historically as the charge that organised entire reform movements, and the clearest case is the eighteenth-century alliance between Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and the Saudi ruling family.

Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, an eighteenth-century scholar in the Arabian peninsula, argued that widespread popular practices, visiting the tombs of saints and prophets to seek intercession, building domed shrines over graves, seeking blessing (baraka) from relics or trees, had reintroduced the very idolatry Islam was sent to abolish, even though practitioners themselves did not consider these acts worship of anyone but God. His alliance with Muhammad ibn Saud in 1744 gave the reform political force, and Wahhabi forces destroyed shrines and tomb domes, including at Karbala in 1802 and repeatedly around Mecca and Medina as Saudi control expanded in the twentieth century, on the ground that elaborate graves and the practices around them constitute or lead to shirk.

The campaign has been consistently contested from within Sunni Islam itself. Ottoman religious authorities, most Sufi orders, and traditionalist scholars across the Hanafi, Shafii and Maliki schools rejected the extension as a departure from centuries of accepted practice, arguing that intermediary requests to the righteous dead, understood correctly, are a request for prayer rather than worship of the deceased, no different in kind from asking a living person to pray for one. The disagreement is not archival: it continues to shape which shrines are permitted, tolerated or demolished in different Muslim-majority states today, and it surfaces whenever contested sites, including some destroyed by later militant groups citing the same reasoning, draw international attention.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Islam, Religions
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Shirk, associating partners with God, is rejected as the gravest sin in Twelver Shia Islam.

Sunni, Denominations

Shirk, associating partners with God, is rejected as the gravest sin in Sunni Islam.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)

Positions on This Question

Shirk is affirmed in Ahmadiyya doctrine.

Source The Study Quran: A New Translation and CommentarySeyyed Hossein Nasr (editor-in-chief)
Ibadism, Denominations

Shirk is affirmed in Ibadi doctrine.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)

Shirk is affirmed in Ismaili doctrine, and the tradition's negative theology presses the point further than most: God is beyond both affirmation and negation, so that even attributing being to Him is a form of association.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)

Shirk is affirmed in Kharijite doctrine.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)

Shirk is affirmed in Quranist argument, and the charge is pressed against the elevation of hadith to a source alongside the Quran.

Shirk is the organising category of Salafi doctrine, extended beyond idolatry to intercession, oath-taking by other than God and the veneration of tombs, which is what makes the charge operative against other Muslims.

Sufism, Denominations

Shirk is affirmed in Sufism, and the Sufi enlargement of it is interior: the hidden shirk the tradition warns against is the self set up as a second object of regard.

Source Mystical Dimensions of IslamAnnemarie Schimmel

Shirk is the organising category of Wahhabi doctrine, and its extension to the veneration of tombs and to intercession sought from the dead is what the movement was founded to press.

Shirk is affirmed in Zaydi doctrine.

Source The Study Quran: A New Translation and CommentarySeyyed Hossein Nasr (editor-in-chief)

Related To

The offence the Quran places outside the grading rather than at the top of it.

Sources
1. The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary
Seyyed Hossein Nasr (editor-in-chief), HarperOne, 2015Commentary on 4:48 and 4:171View the Source
2. Islamic Creeds: A Selection
W. Montgomery Watt, Edinburgh University Press, 1994View the Source
An Introduction to Shi'i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi'ism
Moojan Momen, Yale University Press, 1985View the Source
The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition
P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.), Brill, 2005View the Source
The Qur'an
4:48 and 4:116; 4:171; 9:31; 39:3View the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.